January 2004
I have at last made published 'A Camera For Genealogy' on this website. The
pages were ready at the beginning of December - but at the last minute a
problem was found whereby the font size displayed be IE5 was over large - when
compared with other browsers. After spending a lot of time investigating I
discovered that it was a false alarm and it was due to other settings on that
particular system.
Although I had used a translucent screen over the background since establishing
this website in 1999 - it has only just come to my notice that Internet Explorer
was about as fast as a snail in treacle when scrolling these pages. I do not
use IE other than for testing and historically had relied on friends with IE for
testing new webpages. At that time the sluggishness was attributed to slow
internet responce. (If you are using IE and want to see for yourself click -
Map of This Website - below - scroll down to the bottom then click -
Graphics for Genealogists).
My first reaction was to make the background selectable according to browser -
but this could lead to long term page maintainance problems. I had designed my
pages to be viewed by the greatest number of browser types - including older
versions that might have still been in use - all without browser typing.
That was nearly five years ago - a very long time in computing terms - and time
to move on. With this in mind I have set the older limit to Netscape 4.x
and IE 5.x browsers (or equivalent). Older browsers can still view these pages
- but the layouts may not be as intended.
Having decided this I was able extend the use Style Sheets which allow control
page layouts from a single common external file. The original pages and page
template were designed using Netscape Composer - which like most screen editors
- inserted a lot of unnecessary html tags - also leaving empty ones when parts
were deleted - and enevitably the opening and closing tags got out of step -
making page layout unpredictable.
Converting to Style Sheets has been major surgery - taking from 15 to 50
minutes per page. Tags must be removed in matching pairs - with pages having
upto 1,200 lines - finding matching tags has been a labourious task. I would
have liked to have made even more use of Style Sheet but complete browser
compliance is still a dream.
New Webpage-sets
I am presently preparing two sets of pages for publication at this
website - these being:-
-
A Digital Camera for Genealogy
- which describes the selection process leading to the purchase of a Canon
PowerShot A40 in October 2002 for general & genealogical use. These pages
also review how the Canon A40 has performed over the last year - and met my
purchase requirements. I have taken in excess of 1200 shots over the year and a
range sample shots will be included.
I had originally intended publishing this review during October but decided that
it was more important to update my website as a whole before adding more pages.
There will be about 8 new pages which time permitting - should be ready for
uploading early in December.
-
Security Issues
- having been hit by a couple of pernicious worm-virus earlier this year
causing havoc - and having talked around. It became apparent that something
was needed giving an overview of these issues - and suggesting defensive
actions.
I drafted an outline for these pages back in August - and had
intended publishing them in a few months time after further research. However
- the issue of security was raise at a WSFHS computer group meeting - and a
security discussion has been set-up for the 7th January
meeting. I will be
trying to publish about 10 new pages relating to this by then - BUT DONT HOLD
YOUR BREATH.
These new page-sets will use frames for their navigation.
Generally I object to frames being used on a website - as
bookmarking of individual pages is impossible - thus forcing all traffic to
enter via the home page. This in turn increases the load on a website as
visitors may need to navigate via two or three pages instead of going directly
to any given page. This is a double wammy as the extra load slows the responce
and you also have to wait for for unwanted navigation pages to load.
Exceptions to this are websites that generate pages according to form input -
such as - search engines - flight & train times etc., where frames are a
positive advantage.
So what's my excuse for using frames? Well these are sets of pages intended to
be viewed as a group - and frames are ideal for this. There is only need to
bookmark the title pages and this is still possible.
Life is still throwing things at us that put extra demands on our time -
consequently we still haven't completely recovered following our move. So
there will still be delays in replying to your email - sorry but there are just
not enough hours in the day (or night).
Genealogy
I added the surname
BRACKPOOL
to my interests early September and I've already had a positive responce. If
this links it could take me back to c.1660 in one swoop - give or take a bit of
validation.
The rarity of the name must make it a contender for a one-name-study - does
anyone know if it already is?
Whilst on the one-name-study subject
I still harbour the idea of doing a COWING one-name study - but wouldn't
want to do it single handed. Anyone interested?
Spam
I am still being plaged by a high volume of junk mail - but there is some good
news on this front - the EU is at last followed Austraila's and made it
illegal. The downside is it can only apply to EU sourced spam or spam
promoting EU companies - but if you do get any EU sourced or publishing EU
companies - do us all a favour - report it!
I am surprised that the providers of throw-away addresses such as HotMail -
Yahoo etc.are not required to restrict the amount of mail that can be posted
from any given address in
any given time period - thus allowing the complaints to come in - and
preventing vast batches being posted.
I have been testing MailWasher since April and after couple of weeks spam had
dropped from 100 to 15 per day - but it has crept back up to nearly 40 per day.
I'm now suspicious that spammers recognise bounce notices - and use
these as confirmation that an address is valid - so don't use its bounce
facility.
Now MailWasher bounces mail via your own ISP and the bounce message format will
vary according your ISP - which doesn't identify MailWasher. The only thing I
can think of is that the time delay before getting the bounce message is greater
than it would be with a live automated bounce - particularly if you don't check
your mail every day!
So has MailWasher become a victim of its own success? Well not
through recognisable bounce messages - and if it is by date stamp delay - it
would apply equally to any other programs that bounce mail.
I really don't understand the mentality of these spammers. If someone is
bouncing mail then it is obvious that they don't want it! And sending me -
mail about getting more from Uncle Sam etc. when I have a .co.uk address. What
is wrong with these people? Maybe our government should ask the countries that
host them for compensation for the costs that are inflicting on us all!
Worms
(This has been left in from last month as it relates to security)
I have have had a second worm infection (or rather my computers have) FunLove
this time which managed to infect a lot of files before being dectected. That
will teach me to keep my virus files up-to-date. I suspect it jumped across
my network and infected our second computer that is without virus protection
because it is not used on the internet. The infection had also spread to some
CDRW's used for backup - so it has been quite an exercise in exorcism - ugh!.
|
Here In Southern England right
now.
September & October were generally dry and sunny with temeratures above
average.
November has been mixed with sunny spells on many days with above average
temperatures - but the last three days have been continuous steady rain.
We haven't had a serious frost yet so some trees are still hanging on to their
remaining leaves.
November Dawn
|
The picture was taken at 07:42 Nov 13 looking due
south. It is a
colour picture but it is barely light enough for colours to show. The ridge
just visible at tree top level is about 2 miles distant.
|
Enjoy your visit -
James Montague
Monday, 12th February 2004
|
|